Strategi Bertahan Hidup Mahasiswa IKIP Budi Utomo Malang dengan Menjadi Buruh Bangunan

Winin Maulidya Saffanah* -  IKIP Budi Utomo Malang, Indonesia
Faizal Kurniawan -  IKIP Budi Utomo Malang, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ars.v9i1.1956

Working part-time is a way for some student to make a living. There are several jobs that usually done by students, such as shopkeeper or waiters. One of unsual jobs undertaken by students is construction worker. For IKIP Budi Utomo students from East Nusa Tenggara, part-time job as construction worker is one of their choices. There some reason for this choices, but the main reason is this work financially stable and flexible work time. Being a construction worker is a way they do as survival mechanism. A number of thing such as social capital and social network, play a role in their choice. This study uses a phenomenological qualitative apporoach to expose how survival mechanism is done by students who become construction workers. Informan in this research is IKIP Budi Utomo students from NTT who work as a construction workers. On this research, data collected by using  interview, observation, and documentation. From this research, it is known that students utilize social capital in form of netwoeks as survival mechanism for their life and tuition fees. This networks based of similarity origin that helped these students become a construction worker and survive. 

Keywords
Strategi Bertahan Hidup; Mahasiswa; Buruh Bangunan;
  1. Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  2. Atkinson, RL, et al. (1996). Hilgard’s Introduction to Psychology Twelfth Edition. Florida: Harcourt Brace & Company.
  3. Asheber, T. (2010). Social Capital as a Survival Mechanism: The case of some street children and Youth in Addis Ababa. VDM Publishing.
  4. Baiquni, M. (2007). Strategi penghidupan di masa krisis: belajar dari desa. IdeAs Media.
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Social Capital (pp241-58) in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education J. Richardson (ed) Greenwood Press, New York.
  6. Carnevale, A. P., & Smith, N. (2018). Balancing work and learning: Implications for low-income students.
  7. Field, J. (2008). Social Capital. London and New York: Routledge
  8. Grootaert, C. & van Bastelaer, T. (2002). The Role of Social Capital in Development: An Empirical Assesment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Hutapea, W. W., LS, B. O., & Ngangi, C. R. (2016). Modal Sosial sebagai Strategi Bertahan Hidup Buruh Tani di Desa Kopiwangker, Kecamatan Langowan Barat, Minahasa. Agri-Sosioekonomi, 12(2A), 137-156.
  10. Hyyppä, M. T. (2010). Healthy ties: Social capital, population health and survival. Springer Science & Business Media.
  11. Ibrahim, Bedriati dan Murni Baheram. (2009). Strategi Bertahan Hidup Keluarga Pemulung di Desa Salo Kabupaten Kampar. Jurnal Ichsan Gorontalo, Volume 4, No. 2, Mei-Juni 2009, hal. 2439- 2448.
  12. Idrus, M. (2009). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Sosial: Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Erlangga.
  13. Inglis, D. (2005). Culture and everyday life. Psychology Press.
  14. Jewell, S. (2014). The impact of working while studying on educational and labour market outcomes. Business and Economics Journal, 5(3), 1.
  15. Juniarsih, N. & Solikatun .(2018). Modal Sosial Sebagai Strategi Bertahan Hidup Masyarakat Desa Maria, Kecamatan Wawo, Kabupaten Bima, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi, vol 2 nomor 7.
  16. Maynard, D. C., Joseph, T. A., & Maynard, A. M. (2006). Underemployment, job attitudes, and turnover intentions. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(4), 509-536.
  17. Meert, H. (2000). Rural Community Life and the Importance of Reciprocal Survival Strategies. Sociologia Ruralis, Volume 40, Number 3, July 2000 ©European Society for Rural Sociology.
  18. Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
  19. Rice, F. P., & Dolgin, K. G. (2008). The adolescence: development, relationship, and culture. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  20. Setia, R. (2005). Gali tutup lubang itu biasa: strategi buruh menanggulangi persoalan dari waktu ke waktu. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  21. Siisiainen, M. (2003). Two concepts of social capital: Bourdieu vs. Putnam. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 40(2), 183-204.
  22. Sugiyono. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan (Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D). Bandung. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  23. Suharto, E. (2009). Kemiskinan dan perlindungan sosial di Indonesia: menggagas model jaminan sosial universal bidang kesehatan: dilengkapi dengan: UU No. 40/2004 tentang sistem jaminan sosial nasional, UU No. 11/2009 tentang kesejahteraan sosial. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  24. Svendsen, G. T., & Svendsen, G. L. H. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of social capital: the troika of sociology, political science and economics. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  25. Tolossa, D. (2008). Understanding the Realities of Urban Poor an their Food Security Situasions: A Caser Study at Berta Gibi and Gemachu Safar in Addis Ababa City, Ethiopia. Institute of Developing Economies Japan External Trade Organization. V.R.F. Series no 440 December 2008.
  26. Wiyono, B. B. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Action Research). Malang: Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Malang.
  27. Woolcock, M. (2001). The Place of Social Capital in Understanding Social and Economic Outcomes. Isuma: Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2, 1, 11–17
  28. Zhang, Y., Zhou, X., & Lei, W. (2017). Social capital and its contingent value in poverty reduction: Evidence from Western China. World Development, 93, 350-361.
  29. http://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id diakses 9 September 2019
  30. https://www.bbc.com/news/education-33843987 diakses 15 Mei 2019

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2019-09-12
Published: 2020-05-04
Section: Artikel
Article Statistics: