Enhancing Socio-Economic Dynamics: Assessing Regional Governance and Mining Community Benefits post Law Number 3 of 2020 in North Maluku

Hasyim Hasyim* -  Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri (IPDN), Indonesia
Wirman Syafri -  Graduate School of the Institute of Domestic Government, Indonesia
Nurliah Nurdin -  Graduate School of the Institute of Domestic Government, Indonesia
Mansyur Achmad -  Graduate School of the Institute of Domestic Government, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ars.v12i2.8944

Mining potential in Maluku Province is the largest contributor to nickel mining in Indonesia with nickel reserves of 39% and copper of 92.48% of the national total. Even though nickel and copper are potential resources in this region, they do not yet have production results that have added value and are highly competitive. Now various investors from China are investing in North Maluku with the above potential mining resources. In fact, China is now interested in building a nickel factory in North Maluku, specifically in North Halmahera. The issuance of Law Number 3 of 2020 concerning Amendments to Law Number 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining is a transformation of mineral and coal policy relating to the management and utilization of mineral and coal in Indonesia. The consequence of the amendment to Law Number 4 of 2009, namely the elimination of regional government authority over the management of mineral and coal mining, was taken over by the central government, which applies nationally. The method used in this research is the Hybrid Method as an applied method. The limitation of this research is that it does not technically examine the ecological, economic and social modeling of mining studies in North Maluku. The recommendation of this research is that further in-depth review is needed from a legal, social, ecological and economic perspective to map and review Law No. 3 of 2020, the formation of a cross-sectoral task force to monitor the impact of the implementation of Law No. 3 of 2020 on the environmental and social sectors. and economics.

Keywords
Law no. 3 of 2020; Regional Autonomy; Hybrid Method;
  1. Anggun P. Situmorang. (2019). Artikel: 6 Negara Terkaya di Dunia Berkat Minyak Bumi, Ternyata Ada yang Tak Disangka. Merdeka.com. (Diakses pada 29 Desember 2021, melalui https://www.merdeka.com/uang/6-negara-terkaya-di-dunia-berkat-minyak-bumi.html).
  2. Anonimus 1, Kajian Nilai Tambah Produk Pertanian Kementrin Keuangan Republik Indonesia Badan Kebijakan Fiskal, Jakarta: Pusat Kebijakan Ekonomi Makro, 2012.
  3. Anonim. Bab II Dinamika Ekonomi Qatar dan Hubungannya Dengan Eropa. Yogyakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. (Diakses Diakses pada 29 Desember 2021, melalui http://repository.umy.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/17218/BAB%202.pdf?sequence=6&isAllowed=y).
  4. APBI ICMA. (2020). Undang-Undang No. 3 tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan UU No. 4 tahun 2009. (Diakses pada 12 Desember 2021, melalui http://www.apbi-icma.org/news/3152/undang-undang-no-3-tahun-2020-tentang-perubahan-uu-no-4-tahun-2009#).
  5. Atkinson, Giles and Hamilton, Kirk, (2003), Savings, Growth and the Resource Curse Hypothesis, World Development, 31, issue 11, p. 1793-1807, https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:31:y:2003:i:11:p:1793-1807.
  6. Auty, Richard. (2007). Natural Resources, Capital Accumulation and the Resource Curse. Ecological Economics. 61. 627-634. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.006.
  7. Brunnschweiler, Christa N., Cursing the Blessings? Natural Resource Abundance, Institutions, and Economic Growth (June 27, 2006). CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research at ETH Zurich, Working Paper No. 06/51, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=928330 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.928330
  8. Blaxter, Loraine. dkk. How to Research. Jakarta. Indeks. 2006.
  9. Budiardjo, M. (1998). Partisipasi dan Partai Politik. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  10. Cahyo Prayogo. (2018). Ekonomi Maluku Utara Ditopang Sektor Tambang.(Warta Ekonomi, Diakses pada 12 Desember 2021, melalui https://www.wartaekonomi.co.id/read204904/ekonomi-maluku-utara-ditopang-sektor-tambang.html).
  11. Colette L. Ingraham (2000) Consultation Through a Multicultural Lens: Multicultural and Cross-Cultural Consultation in Schools, School Psychology Review, 29:3, 320-343, DOI: 10.1080/02796015.2000.12086018
  12. Creswell, John W. Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed. Yogyakarta. Pustakan Pelajar. 2012.
  13. Dede, Komala Sari. (2016). Tesis: Pengawasan Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Usaha Pertambangan Mineral Yang Tidak Melakukan Aktifitas Pertambangan Di Kabupaten Solok Selatan. Universitas Andalas.
  14. Dinas Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Maluku Utara. (2021). Percepatan Investasi di Maluku Utara. Provinsi Maluku Utara.
  15. Donald Ary et al, Introduction to Research in Education (Canada: Wadsworth, 2010).
  16. Dunn, N. W. (2003). Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
  17. Dunn, William N. (1994). Public Policy Analysis: an Introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  18. ESDM. (2010). Arti Nilai Tambah Komoditi Tambang. (Diakses pada 12 Desember 2021, melalui https://www.esdm.go.id/id/media-center/arsip-berita/arti-nilai-tambah-komoditi-tambang).
  19. Finer, S. E. Comparative Government. A Pelican Book: Political Science. Penguins Book. 1974. Hlm. 1.
  20. Hamdi, Muchlis. (2014). Kebijakan publik: proses, analisis, dan partisipasi. Bogor. Ghalia. Hlm. 15.
  21. Harian Kompas Online pada situs resminya https://www.kompas.com/skola/read/2021/01/31/170917169/daftar-barang-tambang-di-seluruh-provinsi-di-indonesia-dan-kegunaannya diakses pada tanggal 8 Januari 2021 pukul 15.02 WITA.
  22. Iqbal Shalihin. (2018). Tesis: Pengalihan Kewenangan Pemberian Izin Usaha Pertambangan Mineral-Batubara Oleh Pemerintah Provinsi Sumatera Barat Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Padang: Universitas Andalas.
  23. Iskandar (2014) Instrumen Ekonomi Dalam Kebijakan Lingkungan (Kajian Pengaturan Dalam Hukum Positip dan Perspektif Pengaturan Di Daerah Sebagai Solusi Alternatif Pencegahan Kerusakan Lingkungan dan Konflik Pascatambang). UNIB Scholar Repository.
  24. Islamy, M.Irfan. (2000). Prinsip-prinsip Perumusan Kebijaksanaaan Negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  25. James P. Dorian dan Pavel V. Karaulov. (2012). Joint Mining Ventures in The Former Soviet Union: A Focus on The Russian Federation. CIS Energy and Minerals Development.
  26. Jing Yu, Shuzhen Yao, Rongqiu Chen, Kejun Zhu dan Liandi Yu. (2005). A Quantitative Integrated Evaluation of Sustainable Development of Mineral Resources of A Mining City: A Case Study of Huangshi, Eastern China. Resources Policy. Volume 30, Issue 1.
  27. Koentjaraningrat. (1980). Sejarah Teori Antropologi I (Edisi ke 1), Jakarta: UI -. Press.
  28. Labolo, Muhadam. (2016). Memahami Ilmu Pemerintahan: Suatu Kajian, Teori, Konsep Dan Pengembangannya. Rajawali Press.
  29. Labolo, Muhadam, Rowasiu, Hyronimus, Megandaru Widhi Kawuryan, (2015). Beberapa pandangan dasar tentang ilmu pemerintahan / penyunting, Muhadam Labolo, Megandaru Widhi Kawuryan, dan Hyronimus Rowasiu. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
  30. Lexy J. Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT. Remada Rosdakarya, 2011.
  31. Lauer, Robert H, (2001). Perspektif Tentang Perubahan Sosial, Alih Bahasa,. Alimandan S.U(Perpective on Social Change), Jakarta : PT. Rineka.
  32. Milles, Matthew B. & Huberman, A. Michael. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. California: SAGE Publication, Inc.
  33. Mohamad Susilo. (2017). Artikel: Seabad lalu miskin, bagaimana Qatar bisa jadi salah satu negara terkaya di dunia?. BBC Indonesia. (Diakses pada 29 Desember 2021, melalui https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/dunia-40201628).
  34. Mona Novita, Disertasi: Model Pengembangan Manajemen Entrepreneurship Mahasiswa di Universitas Negeri Padang. Jambi: Universitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, 2020.
  35. Mukhtar, Metode Praktis Penelitian Dekriptif Kualitatif. Jakarta Selatan: Referensi GP Press Group, 2013.
  36. Novianto, E., & Subandi, M. (2020). Kemiskinan di Daerah Kaya Sumber Daya Alam (Studi Kasus Kecamatan Samboja Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara). Jurnal Penelitian Kesejahteraan Sosial, 19(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.31105/jpks.v19i1.1963
  37. Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government. New York, NY, Journal of Leisure Research, 27:3, 302-304, DOI: 10.1080/00222216.1995.11949751
  38. Palupi Anggraeni, Peter Daniels and Peter Davey. The Contribution of Natural Resources on Economic Welfare in Indonesia. The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning. Volume 1, No. 3 2017.
  39. Parson, Wayne, (1997). Public Policy: An Introduction to The Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis, buku 2. Edward Elgar, UK.
  40. Parsons, Wayne. (1997). Public Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  41. PUSHEP. (2020). Memahami Konflik Pertambangan untuk Usaha Pertambangan yang Berkeadilan. (Diakses pada 12 Desember 2021, melalui https://pushep.or.id/memahami-konflik-pertambangan-untuk-usaha-pertambangan-yang-berkeadilan/).
  42. Qian Li, Natalie Stoeckl, David King, dan Emma Gyuris. (2017). Exploring The Impacts of Coal Mining on Host Communities in Shanxi, China. Resources Policy. Volume 53, September.
  43. Rasyid, Ryaas, (2000). Makna Pemerintahan, PT. Mutiara Sumber Daya Widya,. Jakarta.
  44. Ripley and Franklin. (1985). Policy Implementation and Bureaucracy. The Dorsey Press, Chicago.
  45. Rogers, Everett M., (1983). Diffusion of Innovations. London: The Free Press.
  46. Samarina, V. Skufina, T. Samarin, A. Ushakov, D. (2019). Modern conditions and prospects of Russia’s coal mining industry development. Belgorod National Research University.
  47. Sills, David L. (1947). International encyclopedia of the social sciences: volume 1 & 2. New York: Macmillan Co. and The Free Press.
  48. Soekanto, Soerjono. (1999). Sosiologi: Suatu Pengantar, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo.
  50. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  51. The Global Economy dalam situs resminya pada https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/rankings/natural_resources_income/#Indonesia pada tanggal 8 Januari 2021 Pukul 07.56 WITA.
  52. homas R. Dye dalam Dunn, N. W. (2003). Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
  53. Tjokroamidjojo, Bintoro. (1976). Pengantar Administrasi Pembangunan, Jakarta: LP3ES.
  54. Tunggal. (2001), Dalam Anonim, 2020. Nilai Tambah Ekonomis (Economic Value Added/EVA) adalah cara baru untuk mengukur kinerja perusahaan dengan cara mengintegrasikan biaya modal dengan memasukkan biaya hutang (pendekatan tradisional) dan biaya ekuitas (inovasi EVA).
  55. Wahab, Solichin Abdul. (1997). Evaluasi Kebijakan Publik. Malang: IKIP Malang.
  56. Wasistiono, Sadu. (2013). Pengantar Ekologi Pemerintahan. Bandung. IPDN Press.
  57. Winarno. (2007). Kebijakan Publik Teori dan Proses. Yogyakarta: Pressindo.
  58. Winarno, Budi. (2012). Kebijakan Publik: Teori, Proses, dan Studi Kasus. Yogyakarta: CAPS.
  59. Willy Marthen Behuku, A. Kastanya dan D. V. Pattimahu. (2016). Analisis Nilai Tambah Ekonomi (Economy Value Added) Untuk Mengukur Kinerja Keuangan Petani Minyak Kayu Putih Desa Pela Dan Batu Jungku Di Wilayah Kerja Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan Produksi (KPHP) Model Unit III Wae Tina. JHPPK, 15 Agustus.
  60. World Population Review dalam situs resminya pada https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/hdi-by-country pada tanggal 8 Januari 2021 Pukul 07.58 WITA

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2024-02-11
Published: 2024-03-14
Section: Artikel
Article Statistics: