Implementasi E-Government dalam Pengembangan Tata Kelola Smart Village di Desa Rante Mario Kecamatan Tommo Kabupaten Mamuju

Nur Mutma Inna* -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia
Nuryanti Mustari -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia
Amir Muhiddin -  Unievrsitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia

This research aims to understand the implementation of E-Government in Smart Village Governance in Rante Mario Village, Tommo District, Mamuju Regency. The type of research used is qualitative. The data sources used are observation, interview and documentation techniques. The research results show that the implementation of e-government in smart village governance in Rante Mario village, Tommo sub-district, Mamuju district, illustrates that Rante Mario Village faces various challenges and opportunities in implementing the smart village program. The challenges faced in developing smart village governance are due to inadequate human resources, such as villages that already have smart villages, the next challenge is that the website cannot be used yet and the wifi is still in the process of being repaired. And the opportunities faced in terms of developing this smart village are being able to improve the quality of society in the local economy, being able to improve digital infrastructure, improving the quality of life of the community so that it will be better in the future, and to better understand technology so as not to miss out on new innovations and education. for the progress of the village itself and society. using theory according to David Corten, the results show that the implementation components are compatibility between the program and the users or users, compatibility between the program and the implementing organization, compatibility between the group and the users, these components are in the implementation of e-government in smart village governance in Rante Mario village , Tommo sub-district, Mamuju district is in accordance

  1. Achmad, M., Patu, M., & Ashariana, A. (2021). The effect of E-government implementation on the quality of electronic identity card public service in Indonesia. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 21(2), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.31297/HKJU.21.2.3
  2. Adamowicz, M., & Zwolińska-Ligaj, M. (2020). The “Smart Village” as a way to achieve sustainable development in rural areas of Poland. Sustainability, 12(16), 6503.
  3. Adesipo, A., Fadeyi, O., Kuca, K., Krejcar, O., Maresova, P., Selamat, A., & Adenola, M. (2020). Smart and climate-smart agricultural trends as core aspects of smart village functions. Sensors, 20(21), 5977.
  4. Afrizal, D., & Wallang, M. (2021). Attitude on intention to use e-government in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 22(1), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v22.i1.pp435-441
  5. Aichholzer, G., & Strauß, S. (2016). Electronic participation in Europe. Electronic Democracy in Europe: Prospects and Challenges of E-Publics, E-Participation and E-Voting, 55–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27419-5_3
  6. Alcaide Muñoz, L., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2017). Experiences of e-government development implementation in developing countries: Challenges and solutions. International E-Government Development: Policy, Implementation and Best Practice, 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63284-1_1
  7. Alsaif, M. (2013). Factors affecting citizens’ adoption of e-Government moderated by socio-cultural values in Saudi Arabia. In Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Government, ECEG (pp. 578–586). University of Birmingham.
  8. Anando Archie Alexander Pangemanan, S. D. S. K. Y. D. Y. R. (2021). Digital Village Development Planning In Kauditan I. Jurnal Teknik Informatika , 16(4), 393–400.
  9. Ariana, S., Azim, C., & Antoni, D. (2020). Clustering of ICT human resources capacity in the implementation of E-government in expansion area: a case study from pali regency. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1754103.
  10. Asmorowati, S., Setijaningrum, E., Suaedi, F., & Fatmawati Dewi, Y. (2019). Smart Governance in Public Financial Management: A Study of Government Resources Management System (GRMS) in the City of Surabaya. Iapa Proceedings Conference, 481. https://doi.org/10.30589/proceedings.2019.249
  11. Aziiza, A. A., & Susanto, T. D. (2020). The smart village model for rural area (case study: Banyuwangi Regency). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 722(1), 12011.
  12. Azilani, N., Adibrata, Y., & Clement, Y. (2020). Strategi Pemasaran dalam Pengembangan UMKM Berbasis Kerajinan untuk Menghadapi Era Ekonomi Digital. Ipb, 1, 1–7.
  13. Bataineh, L., & Abu-Shanab, E. (2016). How perceptions of E-participation levels influence the intention to use E-government websites. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 10(2), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-12-2015-0058
  14. Bielska, A., Stańczuk-Gałwiaczek, M., Sobolewska-Mikulska, K., & Mroczkowski, R. (2021). Implementation of the smart village concept based on selected spatial patterns–A case study of Mazowieckie Voivodeship in Poland. Land Use Policy, 104, 105366.
  15. Bondarchuk P. (2021). Political Sciences Digitalization in the Values System of Public Administration: National Security Aspect. Sciences of Europe #, 66(66–3), 69–71. http://visnik.knteu.kiev.ua/index.php?op-
  16. Bwalya, K. J., & Mutula, S. (2016). A conceptual framework for e-government development in resource-constrained countries: The case of Zambia. Information Development, 32(4), 1183–1198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666915593786
  17. Cedric Bizimana, S. (2020). E-government Readiness Assessment for Government institutions in Burundi. International Journal of European Studies, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijes.20200401.11
  18. Chan, C. M. L. (2013). From open data to open innovation strategies: Creating e-services using open government data. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1890–1899. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.236
  19. Chohan, S. R., & Hu, G. (2022). Strengthening digital inclusion through e-government: cohesive ICT training programs to intensify digital competency. Information Technology for Development, 28(1), 16–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2020.1841713
  20. Dias, G. P. (2020). Global e-government development: besides the relative wealth of countries, do policies matter? Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 14(3), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-12-2019-0125
  21. Effah, J., & Nuhu, H. (2017). Institutional barriers to digitalization of government budgeting in developing countries: A case study of Ghana. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 82(1), 1–17.
  22. Elbahnasawy, N. G. (2014). E-government, internet adoption, and corruption: an empirical investigation. World Development, 57, 114–126.
  23. Epps, F., Wiley, Z., Teunis, L. J., Johnson, T. M., Patzer, R. E., Ofotokun, I., & Franks, N. (2021). A Framework for Mobilizing Health Care to Respond to the Community Within the COVID-19 Pandemic. In Preventing Chronic Disease (Vol. 18, pp. 1–7). ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd18.200572
  24. Farida, I., & Lestari, A. (2021). Implementation of E-Government as a Public Service Innovation in Indonesia. RUDN Journal of Public Administration, 8(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8313-2021-8-1-72-79
  25. Fatimah, S., Judawinata, M. G., Barkah, M. N., Trimo, L., & Deliana, Y. (2020). Towards smart village: A case study of genteng village development in Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia. Society, 8(2), 663–676.
  26. Ferdiansyah, V., & Hidayat, D. (2014). E-Government: Study Fenomenologi Rw-Net Sebagai Pelayanan Publik Yang Transparan Dan Akuntabel Dengan Optimalisasi Fungsi E-Government Di Pemerintah Kota Bandung. J-IKA: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas BSI Bandung, 1(1), 1–13.
  27. Florano, E. R. (2014). Community Governance for Disaster Recovery and Resilience: Four Case Studies in the Philippines (Issue October). econstor.eu. http://dirp3.pids.gov.ph/webportal/CDN/PUBLICATIONS/pidsdps1438.pdf%5Cnhttp://serp-p.pids.gov.ph/serp-p/details.php?pid=5430&param=Florano%2C+Ebinezer+R.
  28. Furuholt, B., & Sæbø, Ø. (2018). The role telecentres play in providing e‐government services in rural areas: A longitudinal study of Internet access and e‐government services in Tanzania. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84(1), e12006.
  29. Gamayuni, R. R. (2020). Implementation of e-planning, e-budgeting and government internal control systems for financial reporting quality at local governments in Indonesia. Talent Development and Excellence, 12(1), 112–124.
  30. Gamayuni, R. R., & Agusta, E. (2019). E-Planning and E-Budgeting Implementation: A Qualitative Study in Lampung Province. International Journal of Economics, Business, and Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.23960/ijebe.v2i2.54
  31. Gamayuni, R. R., & Hendrawaty, E. (2022). E-Planning, E-Budgeting and the Quality of Government Institution Performance Accountability System in Indonesia. Talent Development & Excellence, 11(1s), 218–225. http://www.iratde.com
  32. Gerli, P., Navio Marco, J., & Whalley, J. (2022). What makes a smart village smart? A review of the literature. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 16(3), 292–304.
  33. Glyptis, L., Christofi, M., Vrontis, D., Giudice, M. Del, Dimitriou, S., & Michael, P. (2020). E-Government implementation challenges in small countries: The project manager’s perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, 119880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119880
  34. Halachmi, A., & Greiling, D. (2013). Transparency, E-government, and accountability: Some issues and considerations. Public Performance and Management Review, 36(4), 562–584. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576360404
  35. Harianja, N. (2018). the E-System Implementation for the Accountability of Padang Sidimpuan Municipality, North Sumatra. Asian Journal of Management Sciences & …, 7(2), 20–26. http://www.ajmse.leena-luna.co.jp/AJMSEPDFs/Vol.7(2)/AJMSE2018(7.2-03).pdf
  36. Hartanto, D., Agussani, A., & Dalle, J. (2021). Antecedents of public trust in government during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia: Mediation of perceived religious values. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 8(4), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJECS/975
  37. Höchtl, J., Parycek, P., & Schöllhammer, R. (2016). Big data in the policy cycle: Policy decision making in the digital era. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26(1–2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.1125187
  38. Hujran, O., Alarabiat, A., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Al-Debei, M. (2023). Digitally Transforming Electronic Governments into Smart Governments: SMARTGOV, an Extended Maturity Model. Information Development, 39(4), 811–834. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211054188
  39. Irsyadillah, R. R., & Ma’ruf, M. F. (2022). Kerjasama Pemerintah Desa Kemiri Dengan Polresta Sidoarjo Dalam Mewujudkan Kampung Tertib Lalu Lintas. Publika, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.26740/publika.v10n1.p101-110
  40. Jauhari, A., Basri, H., & Shabri, M. (2015). Penerapan Good Governanceberbasis E-government Dan Reformasi Birokrasi Dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Kinerja Satuan Kerja Pemerintah Aceh. Jurnal Administrasi Akuntansi …. https://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JAA/article/view/4479
  41. Joshi, P. R., & Islam, S. (2018). E-government maturity model for sustainable E-government services from the perspective of developing countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(6), 1882. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061882
  42. Kalinowski, S., Komorowski, Ł., & Rosa, A. (2022). The Smart Village Concept: Examples from Poland. Instytut Rozwoju Wsi i Rolnictwa PAN.
  43. Kolopaking, L. M., Wahyono, E., Irmayani, N. R., Habibullah, H., & Erwinsyah, R. G. (2022). Re-Adaptation of COVID-19 Impact for Sustainable Improvement of Indonesian Villages’ Social Resilience in the Digital Era. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning, 17(7).
  44. Koniyo, M. H., Giriantari, I. A. D., Sudarma, M., & Wirastuti, N. M. A. E. D. (2021). Domain Concept of E-Government Evaluation Framework in Indonesian Local Government. ICSGTEIS 2021 - 2021 International Conference on Smart-Green Technology in Electrical and Information Systems: Advancing Smart and Green Technologies Toward Society 5.0, Proceedings, 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSGTEIS53426.2021.9650379
  45. Koo, E. (2019). Digital Transformation of Government: From E-Government to Intelligent E-Government (pp. 1–92). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  46. Kumajas, Y. N. (2021). The Effects of Human Resources Quality, Infrastructure, Leadership, and Communication on E-Government Implementation: A Case of Indonesia Local Government. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 597–612.
  47. Kusuma, T. P., Setyadi, D. S., Andaru, I. W., & ... (2022). Reformasi Birokrasi Dalam Aspek Efisiensi Dan Transparansi Pada Pelayanan Birokrasi Pemerintahan Kota Batu. AS-SIYASAH: Jurnal …. https://ojs.uniska-bjm.ac.id/index.php/Asy/article/view/5160
  48. Kyakulumbye, S., Pather, S., & Jantjies, M. (2019). Towards design of citizen centric e-government projects in developing country context: The design-reality gap in Uganda. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 7(4), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm070403
  49. Lee-Geiller, S., & Lee, T. (David). (2019). Using government websites to enhance democratic E-governance: A conceptual model for evaluation. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 208–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.003
  50. Leong, C., Pan, S. L., Newell, S., & Cui, L. (2016). The emergence of self-organizing e-commerce ecosystems in remote villages of China: A tale of digital empowerment for rural development. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 40(2), 475–484. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.2.11
  51. Low, C. C. (2021). Digitalization of migration management in Malaysia: Privatization and the role of immigration service providers. Journal of International Migration and Integration. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-021-00809-1
  52. Majeed, M. T., & Ayub, T. (2018). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and economic growth nexus: A comparative global analysis. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 12(2), 443–476.
  53. Manenji, T., & Marufu, B. (2016). The impact of adopting e-government as a mechanism to enhance accountability as well as transparent conduct within public institutions. Scholedge International Journal of Business Policy & Governance ISSN 2394-3351, 3(7), 84. https://doi.org/10.19085/journal.sijbpg030701
  54. Marinică, C. E. (2020). Digitalization-The Key for Adapting Good Administration to a Better Governance. Academic Journal of Law and Governance, 8.2, 111–123.
  55. Maulita, N. (2022). Abdi dosen. Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat, 6(2), 352–356.
  56. Meiyanti, R., Utomo, B., Sensuse, D. I., & Wahyuni, R. (2018). e-Government challenges in developing Countries: A literature review. 2018 6th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), 1–6.
  57. Milakovich, M. E. (2012). Digital governance: New technologies for improving public service and participation (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203815991
  58. Mohanty, S., Mohanta, B., Nanda, P., Sen, S., & Patnaik, S. (2020). Smart village initiatives: an overview. Smart Village Technology: Concepts and Developments, 3–24.
  59. Mynenko, S. V., & Liulov, O. V. (2022). The impact of digitalization on the transparency of public authorities.
  60. Napitupulu, D. (2017). A conceptual model of e-government adoption in Indonesia. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 7(4), 1471–1478.
  61. Nas, J., Nurlinah, & Haryanto. (2019). Indigenous village governance: Lessons from Indonesia. Public Administration Issues, 2019(6), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2019-0-6-94-104
  62. Nasution, A. P., & Atika. (2019). Implementation of E–Budgeting as an Effort of the Enhancement of Transparency and Accountability in the Government of Binjai City in North Sumatra. 3rd International Conference on Accounting …. https://doi.org/10.2991/icame-18.2019.42
  63. Nasution, D. A. D., & Ramadhan, P. R. (2019). Pengaruh implementasi e-budgeting terhadap transparansi keuangan daerah di Indonesia. E-Jurnal Akuntansi. https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/1916903
  64. Negumbo, S. I. (2018). E-Government for Good Governance : Barriers to the Implementation of Digital Workflows in the Namibian Public Service (Issue March, p. 129). Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University. https://scholar.sun.ac.za:443/handle/10019.1/103753
  65. Nimer, K., Uyar, A., Kuzey, C., & Schneider, F. (2022). E-government, education quality, internet access in schools, and tax evasion. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2044587.
  66. Oktariyanda, T. A., & Rahaju, T. (2018). E-government strategy of Surabaya city government through e-rt/rw to improve the quality of public service. Journal of Physics: Conference …. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012161
  67. Ong, A. K., Prasetyo, Y., Roque, R. A. C., Garbo, J. G. I., Robas, K. P. E., Persada, S. F., & Nadlifatin, R. (2022). Determining the Factors Affecting a Career Shifter’s Use of Software Testing Tools amidst the COVID-19 Crisis in the Philippines: TTF-TAM Approach. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU141711084
  68. Park, C., & Cha, J. (2019). A trend on smart village and implementation of smart village platform. International Journal of Advanced Smart Convergence, 8(3), 177–183.
  69. Patnaik, S., Sen, S., & Mahmoud, M. S. (2020). Smart village technology. Modeling and Optimization in Science and Technologies, 17, 181–189.
  70. Ponti, B., Cerrillo-i-Martínez, A., & Mascio, F. Di. (2021). Transparency, Digitalization and corruption. In Understanding and Fighting Corruption in Europe: From Repression to Prevention (pp. 97–126). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82495-2_6
  71. Purón-Cid, G. (2014). Measuring e-government efficiency from the perspective of implementers: The case of e-budgeting in Mexico. Public Administration and Information Technology, 5, 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9982-4_7
  72. Puspitarini, R. (2023). Application of E-Government to Financial Accountability in the Surabaya City. Jurnal Samudra Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 14(3), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.33059/jseb.v14i3.6844
  73. Rachmawati, T., & Fitriyanti, K. D. (2021). Analysis of the E-government initiative at local government level in Bandung City, Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 25(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.22146/JSP.58966
  74. Rafinzar, R., & Kismartini, K. (2020). Inovasi e-Government dalam Pelayanan Publik (Studi Pada Faktor Pendukung dan Penghambat Program e-Musrenbang di Kota Surabaya). Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 6(2), 227–250.
  75. Raudah, R., Hidir, A., Nor, M., & Erliani, S. (2021). Understanding Educational Management in The Context of Environmental Protection for Madrasah Application. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(2), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v4i2.1586
  76. Renukappa, S., Suresh, S., Abdalla, W., Shetty, N., Yabbati, N., & Hiremath, R. (2022). Evaluation of smart village strategies and challenges. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment.
  77. Rido, A. (2020). Urgency Of Content Village Regulation In The Framework Of Village Governance. In Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies (Vol. 1, Issue 2, p. 123). Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang. https://doi.org/10.31000/ijlp.v1i2.2970
  78. Rorissa, A., & Demissie, D. (2010). An analysis of African e-Government service websites. Government Information Quarterly, 27(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.003
  79. Roy, J. (2006). E-government in Canada: Transformation for the digital age. In E-Government in Canada: Transformation for the Digital Age. University of Ottawa Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book4431
  80. Sabani, A. (2020). Investigating the influence of transparency on the adoption of e-Government in Indonesia. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 12(2), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-03-2020-0046
  81. Sabani, A., Deng, H., & Thai, V. (2019). Evaluating the development of E-government in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Information Management, 254–258.
  82. Sakti, R. R. A. (2021). Measurement of Financial Performance Using the Concept of Value for Money in The Government of Bandung City. JASa (Jurnal Akuntansi, Audit Dan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi), 5(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.36555/jasa.v5i1.1470
  83. Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2012). Are government internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(SUPPL. 1), S72–S81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.004
  84. Sari, K. D. A., & Winarno, W. A. (2012). Implementasi E-Government System dalam Upaya Peningkatan Clean and Good Governance. Jeam, 11(1), 1–19.
  85. Schuppan, T. (2009). E-Government in developing countries: Experiences from sub-Saharan Africa. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.01.006
  86. Setyawan, S., Priyono, N., & Iswanaji, C. (2018). Development Model of E-Budgeting and E-Reporting System on the Management of Village Fund Finance. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 9(1), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v9i1.12000
  87. Setyawan, W., & Gamayuni, R. R. (2020). The Quality of Financial Reporting and Internal Control System before and after the Implementation of E-budgeting in Indonesia Local Government. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 14(3), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2020/v14i330194
  88. Suhardi, S., Sofia, A., & Andriyanto, A. (2015). Evaluating e-government and good governance correlation. J. ICT Res. Appl, 9(3), 236–262.
  89. Sukarno, M., & Nurmandi, A. (2023). E-Government Development Index Impact on World Governance Indicator Index in Southeast Asian Countries. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy, 4(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v4i1.106
  90. Suryana, P. A. E., Yani, A. A., & Abdullah, M. T. (2024). Technology, Transparency, and Accountability: The Case of Smart Auditing in Makassar. Journal of Digital Sociohumanities, 1(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.25077/jds.1.1.53-62.2024
  91. Suyatna, R., Madya, W. A., Pengembangan, B., Daya, S., Daerah, M., & Banten, P. (2019). Desa Digital sebuah Konsep Katalisasi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa. Januari, 1, 22–26.
  92. Todoruţ, A. V., & Tselentis, V. (2018). Digital technologies and the modernization of public administration. Quality - Access to Success, 19(165), 73–78.
  93. Wairiuko, J. W., Nyonje, R., & Omulo, E. (2018). Human resource capacity and adoption of e-government for improved service delivery in Kajiado County, Kenya. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 9(10), 94–110.
  94. Wang, X., & Zhu, Q. (2022). Influencing factors of traditional village protection and development from the perspective of resilience theory. Land, 11(12), 2314.
  95. Wen, J., Deng, P., Zhang, Q., & Chang, C. P. (2021). Is higher government efficiency bringing about higher innovation? Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(3), 626–655. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.14269
  96. Wijayanto, H. (2015). Transparansi Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah (APBD) Melalui Penerapan E-Budgeting (dalam Perspektif Teori Good Governance). The Indonesian Journal of Public …. https://journal.uta45jakarta.ac.id/index.php/admpublik/article/view/79
  97. Wilke, N. G., Howard, A. H., & Pop, D. (2020). Data-informed recommendations for services providers working with vulnerable children and families during the COVID-19 pandemic. Child Abuse and Neglect, 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104642
  98. Wilson, G. A., Hu, Z., & Rahman, S. (2018). Community resilience in rural China: the case of Hu Village, Sichuan Province. Journal of Rural Studies, 60, 130–140.
  99. Woro, S. J., & Supriyanto, S. (2013a). Enhancing Trust, Transparency and Accountability in The Local Development Process. Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v20i1.1865
  100. Woro, S. J., & Supriyanto, S. (2013b). Enhancing Trust, Transparency and Accountability in The Local Development Process. Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal, 20(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v20i1.1865
  101. Yap, C. S., & Ahmad, R. (2020). Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government Services in Malaysia. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 1–4). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_4105-1
  102. Zhang, X., & Zhang, Z. (2020). How do smart villages become a way to achieve sustainable development in rural areas? Smart village planning and practices in China. Sustainability, 12(24), 10510.
  103. Zhao, L., He, F., & Zhao, C. (2020). A framework of resilience development for poor villages after the wenchuan earthquake based on the principle of “build back better.” Sustainability, 12(12), 4979.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2024-08-19
Published: 2023-12-31
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: