Analysis of Sidampak Service Innovation as Glocalization of E-government In Wukirsari Village, Sleman Regency

Hanantyo Sri Nugroho* -  Universitas AMIKOM Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ars.v8i2.2458

The Population Data Utilization System (Sidampak) in Wukirsari Village, Sleman Regency is a population administration service program that has provided many benefits. The background lacks clear planning in developing services to the community and a low level of community participation in the administration of population documents which then becomes the basis for creating a population administration service system that can provide complete, accurate, fast, easy and integrated results. This then led to a commitment for the village government of Wukirsari in making public service innovations. This innovation is not only the value of fast, easy, inexpensive, but more on the value of services that can be adapted to the culture of the Wukirsari community. Related, this study found that there are public services that consist of the Population Data Utilization System (Sidampak) program in Wukirsari Village which can then change service policies to better suit the social conditions of the community. Meanwhile, the research method used by researchers is a qualitative descriptive research method

Keywords
E-Government Glocalization; Population Data Utilization System (Sidampak)
  1. Arfani, R. N. (2004). Globalisasi: Karakteristik & Implikasinya. Journal Al-Manär, (April 2003), 1–13.
  2. Arundel, A., Bloch, C., & Ferguson, B. (2019). Advancing innovation in the public sector : Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals. Research Policy, 48(3), 789–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.001
  3. Bijl-brouwer, M. Van Der. (2019). Problem Framing Expertise in Public and Social Innovation. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.01.003
  4. Edler, J., & Yeow, J. (2016). Connecting demand and supply : The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation. 45, 414–426.
  5. Featherstone, M., Lash, S., & Robertson, R. (1995). Global Modernities (Roy Boyne, M. Hepworth, S. Lash, R. Robertson, & B. S. Turner, eds.). London: SAGE Publication s.
  6. Giulianotti, R., & Robertson, R. (2007). Forms of glocalization : globalization and the migration strategies of Scottish football fans in North America. Loughborough University Institutional Repository, 41(1).
  7. Indonesia, M. P. A. N. dan R. B. R. (2017). Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Dan Reformasi Birokrasi REPUBLIK INDONESIA Nomor 17 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pedoman Penilaian Kinerja Unit Penyelenggara Pelayanan Publik.
  8. Indrajit, R. E. (2016). Konsep Dan Strategi Electronic Government.
  9. Informasi, M. K. dan. (2003). Kebijakan Dan Strategi Nasional Pengembangan e-Government: Panduan Penyusunan Rencana Induk Pengembangan E-Government Lembaga. Jakarta.
  10. Lenihan, H., Mcguirk, H., & Murphy, K. R. (2019). Driving innovation : Public policy and human capital. Research Policy, (October 2017), 103791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.015
  11. Matei, A., & Bujac, R. (2016). Innovation and Public Reform. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39(November 2015), 761–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30278-7
  12. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  13. Pastuh, D. (2015). Book Review - Global Themes and Local Variations in Organization and Management – Perspectives on Glocalization, Gili S. Drori, Markus A. Höllerer, Peter Walgenbach (Eds.), Routledge, New York/London, 2014 xv+432 pp., 78,95$ (paperback), ISBN: 978-0-415-8. Journal of International Management, 21, 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2014.11.001
  14. Petros, S., Johnson, M., & Enquist, B. (2016). Service Innovation in a Complex Service System : Public Transit Service Sustainability Business Cases. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224(August 2015), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.459
  15. Ritzer, G. (1983). The McDonaldization of Society. Journal of American Culture, 6(1), 371–379.
  16. Ritzer, G. (2003). The Globalization of Nothing. SAIS Review, XXIII(2), 189–200.
  17. Rivera, J. D., & Landahl, M. R. (2019). An environment conducive to bureaucratic innovation ?: Exploring the potential for public entrepreneurship within FEMA. Journal of Urban Management, (March), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2019.03.001
  18. Scupola, A., & Zanfei, A. (2016). Governance and innovation in public sector services : The case of the digital library ☆. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.005
  19. Shareef, M. A., Raman, R., Baabdullah, A. M., Mahmud, R., Uddin, J., Kabir, H., … Mukerji, B. (2019). International Journal of Information Management Public service reformation : Relationship building by mobile technology. International Journal of Information Management, 49(March), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.007
  20. Sigismondi, P. (2011). The Economics of Information , Communication , and Entertainment The Impacts of Digital Technology in the 21st Century (D. Gerbarg, ed.). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
  21. Sobari, W. (2019). Menulis Proposal Inovasi Pelayanan Publik. Malang.
  22. Sousa, M. D. M., Soares, R., Najberg, E., & Medeiros, J. J. (2015). Portraying innovation in the public service of Brazil: Frameworks, systematization and characterization. Revista de Administração, 50(4), 460–476. https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1213
  23. Stoshikj, M., Kryvinska, N., & Strauss, C. (2016). Service Systems and Service Innovation : two pillars of Service Science. Procedia - Procedia Computer Science, 83(Ant), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.118
  24. Torregrosa-hetland, S., Pelkonen, A., Oksanen, J., & Kander, A. (2019). The prevalence of publicly stimulated innovations – A comparison of Finland. Research Policy, (December 2018), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.001
  25. Vickers, I., Lyon, F., Sepulveda, L., & Mcmullin, C. (2017). Public service innovation and multiple institutional logics : The case of hybrid social enterprise providers of health and wellbeing. Research Policy, 46(10), 1755–1768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.003
  26. Weber, K. M., Heller-schuh, B., & Godoe, H. (2014). ICT-enabled system innovations in public services : Experiences from intelligent transport systems. Telecommunications Policy, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2013.12.004
  27. Winarno, B. (2008). Globalisasi dan Masa Depan Demokrasi. Global & Strategis, 3(2), 123–141.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2020-02-24
Published: 2020-06-01
Section: Artikel
Article Statistics: